Japanese Policy

Consequently, when American forces finally work japan, the nation was fully prepared to enter into a solid state defense and economic trammel with the join States against the Soviet substance (Zagorsky, 1993, p. 137).

The United States similarly had reasons for wanting a strong chemical bond with Japan. Japan stood squarely in the middle of the Asian perfect where American influence was less than desirable. An alliance would permit a foothold by the United States in a surface area of the world where communist aggression might otherwise go unchecked. These correlative interest for an alliance led to inseparable economic ties and, eventually, to the U.S.-Japanese credentials Treaty in 1951. The Treaty officially incorporate Japan into the U.S.-initiated containment policy directed against the Soviet Union.

Japan took rough advantage of the American interest in containing Soviet expansionism. The U.S.-Japan Security Treaty locked the United States into playing a major determination in ensuring Japan's tribute from foreign invasion all the age guaranteeing that Japan would have to contribute very little to its hold defense needs. The Treaty codified the American commitment to crusade Japan from external aggression in exchange for allowing the stationing of nearly 100,000 American troops on Japanese soil. The agreement was sooner one-sided, however: although the United States agreed to defend Japan, the Japanese assum

The close "united front" of the United States and Japan in the Asian Pacific region did non alarm the People's Republic of china. For the quarter century prior to its demise, the Soviet build-up of conventional and nuclear forces was viewed by the Chinese as a far greater threat. At the height of Soviet expansionism, not only did China implicitly support the American forward-deployed position in Japan, China explicitly joined in the choir of encouraging Japan to develop its receive military capabilities. In 1978, China and Japan deepened their military and economic cooperation, signing the friendship Treaty with a controversial "anti-hegemony" clause aimed directly at Moscow. Thus, a U.S.-China-Japan trilateral alignment took shape .

This competition amid China and Japan is likely to keep the U.S.-Japan security emplacement alive and well in the near future. But an alliance amid an economic go-getter and a military powerhouse may well prove irresistible in the ache run, especially since the world now lacks the guiding force of a hostile U.S.-Soviet rivalry.

However, Japan is still finding military-security arrangements with Asian nations intemperate to forge. In addition to the historic distrust between Japan and many Asian nations, there is the problem of competition between China and Japan for domination of any such security relationship. While the Chinese economy has not blossomed like Japan's, China has nearly doubled its defense spending since 1988, making it the nigh formidable military power in the region and a major military force in global geopolitics (Levin, 1993, p. 213).

Levin, N. (1993). The strategical dimensions of Japanese foreign policy. In G. Curtis (Ed.), Japan's foreign policy. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

ed little obligation to defend American interests, even in the amended version of the Treaty in 1960 when the word "mutual" was inserted into the treaty's title. At the same time, Japan was permitted to contribute little to its own d
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.