A Preface To Philosophy(philosophy Of Religion)

Three DefinitionsFundamental Idea . A wakeless idea is a general and pervasive supposition that is the foundation for a proceeds of different ideas Woodhouse (2006 ) states that fundamental ideas are the most likely to suck philosophical investigation (p . 3 . This inviting nature is due to the meaning , impartiality , and interrelatedness of the ideas (p . 4 Fundamental ideals exist in science , as well as in theology . Just as a fundamental idea in religion might be what is religion a fundamental idea in science might be what is sciencePhilosophical problems pick up questions of meaning , Truth (rational defensibility , and logical relations . Philosophical problems try on to create meaning for a given concept , in that they attempt to identify a definitive form or representation of that concept . One example Woodhouse uses is that of infinite tone (p . 4 . By understanding the meaning of a concept , it is possible to move a step closer to the truth . A similar concept in science is that of the running(a) definition which presents the form that a given concept give take for that discussion . Once a meaning for a concept is defined , it is possible to examine that concept to align if there is any actual basis for believing in its existence or occurrence . Just as the philosopher would yet be interested in the question of whether mystical experiences rattling exist , the scientist would be more interested in look into the existence of gravity rather than investigating a someone s experience with it . Logical relationships are also part of philosophical problems in that they explore truth through the connectedness of the concepts . It is unfeasible to say that a particular belief is the truth when other valid belief contradicts it . Woodhouse (2006 ) uses the example of it being impossible for peter to be a feminist if he is opposed to greater equality for women .

It is also impossible to project some general statements of fact in science , such as both crows are black when other color crows have been observedPhilosophical problems are non straightforwardly empirical . Woodhouse (2006 ) explains that philosophical ideas do non rely on empirical data to investigate a claim . Empirical data is based on directly or indirectly observed phenomenon that is 1 ) either incontrovertible or disprovable and 2 ) can be used to make a prediction about the world (Woodhouse 2006 . Philosophical questions do not seek to make predictions , neither can they be disproved or falsified . Woodhouse uses the example of asking what is cosmos (p . 5 . It is not possible to ask this question in a scientific forum , since there is no way of answering what documentaryity is not . Science would need to ask if something is real as in asking does Bigfoot exist Bigfoot as a real phenomenon is either provable or not and is actually an end of scientific studyReferenceWoodhouse , M . B (2006 . A Preface to doctrine . New York : Wadsworth...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .