There be many an(prenominal) get aheads to re-create c ar fertility, electronic organ transposes, and struggle disease. Although there are many upbeats, the side effects and moral issues are too big for us to continue experimentation.
Firstly, cloning can help us solve many problems worry infertility, diseases, organ transplants and senescence. genius of the benefits of cloning is in fertility. former(a) benefit in fertility is that parents who cant contain kids natur bothy can unsounded have a child related to them. A nonher benefit to cloning is that it can help fight disease. Learning almost genes can lead to cures for cancer. clone could also help organ transplants and would save many lives. The organs used in the transplant could come from the same patient so there pass on not be body rejection. One more benefit, is that scientists may someday be able to reverse the aging process. Cloning can help solve a lot of problems that the man faces today.
However, There are also many reasons not to clone. One disadvantage is the risk of mutation. An abnormal baby could come from mutated genes. Another consequence is emotional problems. A clone could have a hard time finding his or her identity. There would be no need for reproduction if there is cloning. Religious slew believe cloning is the thought of Playing idol. . There are many risks of cloning like mutation, emotional problems, and the thought of vie god.
In conclusion, Disbelievers of cloning say that it is not natural, while the supporters believe many of our modern ways are not natural, but that does not make them wrong. In my opinion, the possible effects and moral concerns are too risky for us to experiment with. We have do it this far without cloning, and we can survive without it.
dear leezj17 .
your topic is quite interesting. besides most of your agruments are claims that are not backed up with fact. How would cloning fight disease ? How would cloning stop aging?
Ok, and you have said that cloning would stamp out internal reproduction (mostly sexual intercourse). hardly you forget that nowadays commonwealth dont have intercourse to reproduce it has become a unskilled activity. So how would cloning stamp out sexual intercourse, when the function of cloning is to reproduce and not pleasure ?
Wouldnt humans have sex anyway ?
You have stated playing God as an agrument against cloning. But have you thought about all the medical technology that we have now ? I spurious just to be vaccinated is playing God. We are insubordinate to small pox because someone has injected us, isnt that playing God ? We could be dead reform now if we werent immune to hepatitis, or other childhood diseases.
I think youre trying to say the right things, but you havent looked into the evidence and the information deeply enough to illustrate, wherefore you think cloning should not be done.
nevertheless skilful luck on your next essay , and I intrust this has helped.
YMW99
this was a graet topic and Im glad to see hoe religon was brought into this essay. I believe that cloning is playing God, but God gave us the ability to learn and experiment. So is it a test by Almighty to see if we abuse this or is it ok?
I rightfully dont think cloning should be considered playing god if like what YMW99 said, we cure diseases all the time that god has created, its the same concept. But otherwise its very brief but concise and to the point.
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment