Kant`s Moral Theory

Immanuel Kant was a ren induceed German Philosopher in the 1700 s . He was well-nigh famous for his Enlightened thoughts . In his writing , Kant addressed his imagination of moral philosophy . Kant believed that judging actions by their consequences is not an weft for moral theory because our consequences are not in our nurse . Kant believed that we have full control over our motives but not full control over the consequences of actions . He also believed that we should not be valued based on the experiences we produceKant addressed the intellect of moral worth as dealing with the act of practiced intention or motive . He called this good go away In Kant s words to act out of duty is to do what is right or what one believes to be right It past comes cover version to one s intentions of right or wrong in their actionsKant uses hypothetical overbearing and insipid imperative to further accentuate what we should or ought to do . He uses these imperatives to describe how our goals and motives determine what we should or ought to do . Moral obligation is unconditional or categorical . Kant s first form or law regarding categorical imperative is that we consider doing something that we can will or can presume that all individuals in the universe will doKant equated the idea of devising false omens to his first form of categorical imperative by describing the situation as if it were world-wide law . If one do promise to borrow money and then consecrate it back knowing in advance that their intention was not to pay it back it would be a lie . As universal law says , everyone from then on made a promise would be lying and this would be a self-destructing act .

No one would ever believe promises , as they would be sensed as falseKant s second form seeks to describe what constitutes proper discussion of a person or person s . In development the example of borrowing money while making a false promise . Would the person who you are borrowing the money know that they will not receive their money ? If no than according to Kant you are using this person as factor rather than as an end where you both share the kindred goalsReferring to the New Drug case a Kantanian would first limit what is lack me to determine what is my motive and intention for taking the dose . Second using the law of categorical imperative a Kantanian would say all runners in the race should take the do drugs so that all runner performances can be as set upd . And do I think that the other runners and officials would demur it if they knew I have used a drug to enhance my performance . My answer is no . They would probably look pour down on it , even though it is not on the banned list . And they may even re-evaluate the listA situation in my own life that I would apply the categorical imperative is with the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .