The Pros And Cons Of Conflict Theory

Running head : Both Sides of date TheoryAnalyzing Both Sides of the Conflict Theory[Name][Institution][Date of Submission]Analyzing Both Sides of the Conflict TheoryConflict supposition was the first radical criminological theory proposed by the scholars in the 1960s (Barkan ,. 254 . It particularly analyzes the office of contraventions in class , gender , and spot in the incidences of wickednesss in a particular society . It tells that these conflicts ar the reasons why slew commit crimes . This specific thought opposes the view of the consensus theory which perceives crime as any behavior that violates criminal law (Barkan ,. 14 . To compare , Conflict theory believes that a crime is distant much complex than the first definition , expect that sight do not share the same values , beliefs and dispositionsBecause of this , the conflict theory becomes one of the theories that are applicable for larger contextual conditions . In fact , the theory encompasses a wide aim of areas which makes it divided into sub- categories , such as radical criminology , peacemaking criminology radical feminism , and left realism (Greek , 2005 . These minorities - the poor , Blacks , Hispanics , to name a few - are being given focus and importance by dint of the theory . Marx and Engels specified that justice is not attainable and is below the belt being administered to the minorities Through the conflict theory , an explanation on why minorities get involved with crimes is provided . The theory explains that laws against crimes are make not for the interest of everyone but wholly for themselves . Laws are make to serve the interest of the business officeful who knows that their illegal malpractices can only become legal if the laws will be made establish on their take . This made conflict theory sounds more realistic with consensus theory .

It has able to portray the problem with power struggles as a source of crime motives that other theories forgotten or missed to seeHowever , proponents of the conflict theory also got blind and missed to see some of the criticisms regarding the conflict . First of all told , it is said that the conflict theory is too generalized and assuming with its discussion on the implementation of laws in societies . Laws connected to the measure of street crimes such as robbery and murder do not necessarily serve the purpose of the powerful and neglects the petty(a) powerful minorities . In fact , such kinds of laws are tell to serve the security of everyone , and not just a little percentage of the people . The theory seems to forget that although people are different in some aspects , they still posses the same characteristics and holds . In this particular situation , all people need security for their lives . The laws protecting people s lives could not be considered as law protecting only the interests of those who are in power it is also for the benefit of other peopleIn addition to this criticism , the theory of conflict also shows a weak spot in terms of labeling disparities . There has been inconsistency in the evidence of such gaps tackling how...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .