In describing his methods in writing the archives of the commutation event of his lifetime - the war between Athens, his city, and Sparta - Thucydides (47) admits that his technique consists of make use of set speeches delivered just prior to and during the war. He in addition notes that he "found it difficult to remember the precise talking to in the speeches to which I listened myself," and that his method therefore consisted of:
....
while keeping as closely as possible to the general
sense of the words that were real used, to make the
speakers say what, in my opinion, was called for by each
This is a very(prenominal) revealing statement: the author of a factual history with strong ideological underpinnings is admitting to his readers and to posterity that he may well drive "made" the speakers say what he, in his view, felt should have been said.
Is this history? The answer must be "yes." Thucydides (48) goes on to farther describe his m
Tacitus. The Agricola and the Germania. Trans. H. Mattingly.
These ideas, put into the mouths of " middling" Athenians confronted with charges against the city, are perhaps as (if not more) expressive of the views of Thucydides than anything else. As a historian, he was therefore not without bias.
Agricola is presented as "possess by a passion for military glory" (Thucydides, Agricola, 55), and thereof can be understood as a backup man for Rome herself.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment